مطالعات برنامه درسی در تربیت و بالندگی معلم

مطالعات برنامه درسی در تربیت و بالندگی معلم

بررسی اثربخشی آموزش تکلیف محور بر پرورش خلاقیت دانشجومعلمان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 اداره آموزش و پرورش شهرستان نوشهر، مدرس دانشگاه فرهنگیان، نوشهر،ایران.
2 دانشکده علوم تربیتی، گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی و آموزش، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد. ایران.
3 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران.
4 گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر به بررسی کاربرد مدل طراحی آموزشی چهار مؤلفه‌ای در آموزش درس کارورزی برای پرورش خلاقیت دانشجومعلمان و مقایسه اثربخشی آن با روش آموزشی رایج پرداخته است. این تحقیق از نوع کاربردی و شبه‌آزمایشی است و از طرح پیش آزمون ـ پس آزمون با گروه گواه استفاده شده است. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی دانشجومعلمان ترم 8 دانشگاه فرهنگیان در استان مازندران در سال تحصیلی 1401-1400 بود و نمونه‌گیری به روش خوشه‌ای تصادفی انجام شد. یک دوره آموزشی 16 جلسه‌ای با رویکرد تکلیف محور و بر اساس مدل چهار مؤلفه‌ای برای دانشجومعلمان طراحی و اجرا گردید. پس از پایان دوره، به منظور سنجش اثربخشی مدل چهار مؤلفه‌ای در پرورش خلاقیت دانشجومعلمان در مقایسه با محیط‌های آموزشی رایج کارورزی، از ابزار محقق ساخته و استاندارد شده استفاده شد و گروه‌های آزمایش و کنترل از نظر میزان خلاقیت در فرایند تدریس مقایسه شدند. نتایج آماری نشان‌دهنده اختلاف معنادار میانگین متغیرها بین گروه‌های کنترل و آزمایش بود. این نتایج حاکی از تأثیر مثبت آموزش تکلیف‌محور و مدل چهار مؤلفه‌ای در پرورش خلاقیت دانشجومعلمان در فرایند تدریس است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Effectiveness of Task-based Instruction in Fostering Student-teachers’ Creativity

نویسندگان English

Somaye Ghazi 1
Morteza Karami 2
Samad Izadi 3
refaeil azadian 4
1 Noshahr City Education Department, Lecturer, Farhangian University, Noshahr, Iran,
2 Department of Curriculum Studies and Instruction, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities and social sciences, university of Mazandaran ,Babolsar, Iran
4 Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The present study investigates the application of a Four-Component Instructional Design (4C/ID) model in teaching the Internship course to foster students' creativity and compares its effectiveness with conventional teaching methods. This research is applied and quasi-experimental, using a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The statistical population included all eighth-semester students at Farhangian University in Mazandaran Province during the 2021-2022 academic year, and random cluster sampling was used for sampling. A 16-session educational course was designed and implemented for the students using a task-based approach and based on the four-component model. After the course, to assess the effectiveness of the four-component model in fostering students' creativity compared to conventional Internship teaching environments, a researcher-made and standardized tool was used, and the experimental and control groups were compared in terms of creativity levels in the teaching process. Statistical results showed a significant difference in the mean variables between the control and experimental groups. These results indicate the positive impact of task-based instruction and the four-component model in fostering students' creativity in the teaching process.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Task-based instruction
Four-component model
Fostering creativity
Student-teachers
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity (Vol. 87). Harvard Business School Publishing Boston, MA.
Assareh, A., Ghahremani, A. A., Abaspour, H., & Mohammad, A. L. (2013). The study on the impact of teachers’ creativity training on improvement of creativity in students and their insights on teacher training curriculum. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, 3(4), 278–284. [In Persian]
Azizi, N., Bolandhematan, K., & Saedi, P. (2019). Creativity Context and Factors in the Teaching of Creative Teachers in Kurdistan Rural Schools. Research in Teaching, 7(2), 88–114. http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2847-fa.html [In Persian]
Barbot, B. (2011). Assessing creativity in the classroom. The Open Education Journal, 4(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874920801104010058
Bräuer, G. (2019). Förderung eigenverantwortlichen Lernens bei der Ausprägung akademischer Literalität. In Professionsorientierung in der Lehrerbildung: Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren nach dem 4-Component-Instructional-Design-Modell. (p. 135). Springer-Verlag.
Cochrane, T., & Antonczak, L. (2015). Designing creative learning environments. Interaction Design and Architecture (s) Journal-IxD&A, 24, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-024-008
Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing creativity in education. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090
Cunningham, W. G., & Sherman, W. H. (2008). Effective nternships: Building Bridges Between Theory and Practice. The Educational Forum, 72(4), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720802361936
de Mora, J. C. (2014). Becoming a teacher through practical knowledge. In In Practical Knowledge in Teacher Education (First, pp. 23–38). Routledge.
Daulay, N. K. (2016). Standards of creative teacher performance. Vision, 9(9), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/vis.v9i9.88
Fouladi, N., & Shahidi, E. (2016). Creativity, thinking style and mental disorders. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8(2), 1726–1736.
Eslamian, H., Ealamian, Z., & Karami, M. (2018). Study of the relationship between the extent of applying effective teaching criteria by faculty and students' academic morale. Research in Curriculum Planning, 15(56), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.30486/jsre.2018.539729 [In Persian]
Francom, G. M., & Gardner, J. (2014). What is task-centered learning?. TechTrends, 58(5),27-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0784-z
Francom, G. M. (2016). Principles for task-centered instruction. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models,Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Vol. IV. Routledge.
Frerejean, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., Roex, A., Aertgeerts, B., &, Marcellis, M., & Frerejean, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Designing instruction for complex learning: 4C/ID in higher education. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 513–524. http://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12363
Gaglione, M. (2021). Nurturing creative problem solving in social sciences in middle school students [Master’s thesis, St. John’s University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://www-proquest-com.libezproxy.iyte.edu.tr/dissertations-theses/nurturing-creative-problem-solving-social/docview/2513311363/se-2?accountid=15253
Ghadermarzi, H., Asgari, M. A., Marufi, Y., & Hosseinikhah, A. (2017). Investigating the L2 motivation of the undergraduate students from the perspective of the "L2 motivational self system." Research in Teaching, 5(3), 131–143. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1778211 LK   [In Persian]
Ghanbari, M., Babaee, Z., & Reza Masouminejad. (2022). Analysis of student-teacher internship course of primary education at Farhangian University: A development-oriented educational understanding. Journal of Research and Writing Academic Books, 25(2), 290–314. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2416419 LK  [In Persian]
Hardie, G., Almeida, S., & Ross, P. J. (2018). Value of Industry Mentoring and Resource Commitment to the Success of an Undergraduate Internship Program: A Case Study from an Australian University. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(2), 155–168.
Herrington, A. J., & Herrington, J. A. (2007). What is an authentic learning environment? In Authentic learning environments in higher education (pp. 68–77). IGI Global. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/897
Ismail, N., Desa, S., & Balakrishnan, B. (2018). Science Creative Teaching Design for Science Teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i4/4156
Karami, M., & Seylane, A. (2015). Enhancing the effectiveness of engineering education with a focus on the automotive industry holistic educational design. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 17(66), 119–139. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1441232 LK [In Persian]
Kimhi, Y., & Geronik, L. (2020). Creativity Promotion in an Excellence Program for Preservice Teacher Candidates. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 505–517. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073962134&doi=10.1177%2F0022487119873863&partnerID=40&md5=a4ffe8d759440abb6cfa2832548f6996.
Klein, C., Herppich, S., Nückles, M., Wittwer, J., Kreutz, J., Liefländer, A. K., Conrad, V., Birke, F., Krieger, T., Leuders, T., Wessel, L., Bräuer, G., Lösch, L., & Zaki, K. (2020). Umsetzungsbeispiele. In Professionsorientierung in der Lehrerbildung (pp. 47–166). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25046-1_3
Conrad, V., Birke, F., Dold, M., & Krieger, T. (2019). 3.4 Das 4C/ID-Lehr-Lern-Konzept in der ökonomischen Bildung. Ein Beitrag zur Stärkung der Professionsorientierung?,Professionsorientierung in der LehrerbildungProfessionsorientierung in der Lehrerbildung: Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren nach dem 4-Component- (J. Kreutz, T. Leuders, & K. Hellmann (eds.). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25046-1
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In Handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315391625-5.
Kreutz, J. (2019). Kompetenzförderung von angehenden Geschichtslehrkräften durch die Konzeption von Unterricht. Ein hochschuldidaktisches Lehr-Lern-Konzept. In Professionsorientierung in der Lehrerbildung: Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren nach dem 4-Component-Instructional-Design-Modell (p. 71). Springer-Verlag.
Kuo, P.-H. (2016). Effects of synchronous web-based instruction on students’ thinking styles and creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 609–619.
Liu, F., Chow, I. H.-S., Zhang, J.-C., & Huang, M. (2019). Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior: Exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 13, 771–789.
Leuders, T., & Wessel, L. (2019). 3.5 Kompetenzorientierte Didaktik der Analysis durch Orientierung an real-life tasks–Ein Beispiel für ein Lehrdesign nach dem 4C/ID-Modell. In J. Kreutz, T. Leuders, & K. Hellmann (Eds.), Professionsorientierung in der Lehrerbildung: Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren nach dem 4-Component-Instructional-Design-Modell (pp. 117–130). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Liefländer, A. K. (2019). 3.3 Aktives Gestalten statt passiver Teilnahme. Authentische Exkursionsgestaltung für Biologie-Lehramtsstudierende. In J. Kreutz, T. Leuders, & K. Hellmann (Eds.), Professionsorientierung in der Lehrerbildung: Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren nach dem 4-Component-Instructional-Design-Modell (pp. 51–64). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25046-1 .
Lubart, T. (Ed.). (2018). The creative process. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50563-7.
Makamure, C. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ prior expectations and their actual experiences of teaching mathematics during pedagogical internship in Zimbabwe. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(6), 983–999. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.983
Mäkelä, T. (2018). A design framework and principles for co-designing learning environments fostering learning and wellbeing. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research. University of Jyväskylä.
McDonald, J. K., West, R. E., Rich, P. J., & Hokanson, B. (2020). Instructional design for learner creativity. In M. J. Bishop, E. Boling, J. Elen, & V. Svihla (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (pp. 375–399). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36119-8_17
Nghia, T., & Tai, H. (2017). Preservice Teachers’ Identity Development during the Teaching Internship. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n8.1
Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of gender and thinking style on student’s creative thinking ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5135–5139.
Raymond, P. (2018). Terror versus soul: The struggle for creativity in primary Initial Teacher Education. Research in Education, 100(1), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523718763432
Schilling, M. A., Vidal, P., Ployhart, R. E., & Marangoni, A. (2003). Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Science, 49(1), 39–56.
Selvi, K. (2010). Teachers’ competencies. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 7(1), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.5840/cultura20107133
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31(4), 197–224.
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). WICS: A new model for school psychology. School Psychology International, 31(6), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034310386534
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The Assessment of Creativity: An Investment-Based Approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652925
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in the school. European Journal of High Ability, 6(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0937445940060211
Sternberg, R. J., O’Hara, L. A., & Lubart, T. I. (1997). Creativity as investment. California Management Review, 40(1), 8–21.
Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652925
Stojanova, B. (2010). Development of creativity as a basic task of the modern educational system. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3395–3400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.522
Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Kester, L. (2008). Whole-task models in education. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 441–456). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13.
Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Medical Education, 44(1), 85–93.
Vandewaetere, M., Manhaeve, D., Aertgeerts, B., Clarebout, G., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Roex, A. (2015). 4C/ID in medical education: How to design an educational program based on whole-task learning: AMEE Guide No. 93. Medical Teacher, 37(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.928407
Walia, C. (2019). A dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 237–247.https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787
Zakirova, R. R. (2016). The structure of primary school teachers’ professional competence. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(6), 1167–1173. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.386a